Search Here

Baba Ramdev Stirs Controversy with Remarks Against Modern Medicine

Baba Ramdev Stirs Controversy with Remarks Against Modern Medicine
Time to Read 4 Min
Rachna Kumari

Baba Ramdev stirs controversy by comparing modern medicine to British rule and Islamic invasion, accusing allopathic medicines of killing millions.

Despite repeated warnings from the Supreme Court of India, yoga guru and businessman Baba Ramdev has once again sparked outrage by making controversial statements against modern medicine. In his latest remarks, Ramdev compared allopathic medicine to British colonial rule and Islamic invasions, accusing it of being responsible for the deaths of millions of people. These comments have reignited a heated debate over the role and impact of traditional versus modern medicine in India.

Ramdev, who is well-known for promoting Ayurveda and other forms of traditional Indian medicine, has long been a vocal critic of allopathy, the modern system of medicine. His recent comments, however, have taken the criticism to a new level, as he likened the effects of allopathic medicine to the violence and oppression experienced during British rule and the spread of Islam in India. “In a similar vein, millions of people have been killed under the name of Islam,” Ramdev said, drawing a parallel that many have found to be not only inflammatory but also dangerously misleading.

These statements come despite clear orders from the Supreme Court to refrain from making such fearmongering and baseless claims against modern medicine. The Court has previously cautioned Ramdev and other public figures against spreading misinformation that could undermine public confidence in allopathic medicine, especially during a time when healthcare systems are under immense pressure. However, Ramdev’s persistence in making these claims suggests that the warnings have had little effect on his rhetoric.

Healthcare professionals and organizations have strongly condemned Ramdev’s comments, accusing him of spreading dangerous misinformation that could harm public health. Dr. Randeep Guleria, Director of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), stated, “These kinds of statements are not only baseless but also harmful. They create unnecessary fear and confusion among people who rely on modern medicine for their health and well-being.”

The Indian Medical Association (IMA) has also issued a statement denouncing Ramdev’s remarks and has urged the government to take strict action against him. “Such statements are a direct attack on the credibility of our healthcare system and undermine the efforts of countless doctors and healthcare workers who have been tirelessly working to save lives,” the IMA’s statement read. The association has called for legal action to be taken against Ramdev for his repeated violations of the Supreme Court’s orders.

Despite the backlash, Ramdev’s comments have found support among some sections of the population, particularly those who advocate for traditional medicine and alternative healthcare practices. His supporters argue that Ramdev is simply highlighting the shortcomings of the allopathic system and promoting the benefits of Ayurveda and other indigenous practices. However, critics argue that his inflammatory language and extreme comparisons do more harm than good, potentially endangering lives by discouraging people from seeking proven medical treatments.

The controversy surrounding Ramdev’s remarks has once again brought the issue of healthcare misinformation to the forefront. As India continues to grapple with public health challenges, the need for accurate, science-based information has never been more critical. The Supreme Court’s stance on the matter is clear, but the persistence of figures like Ramdev in spreading unverified claims suggests that the battle against misinformation is far from over.

The government and healthcare authorities now face the challenge of not only addressing the immediate concerns raised by Ramdev’s comments but also ensuring that public discourse around medicine and health is grounded in fact, not fearmongering.


Also Read This:





Featured News


Recent News