CJI Chandrachud Demands Reports; SC Criticizes West Bengal Government
Chief Justice of India Chandrachud demands review of the Kolkata Police report and post-mortem report of a doctor. The Supreme Court criticizes the West Bengal government for conducting a post-mortem before registering an unnatural death case, with Justice Pardiwala expressing unprecedented concern over the handling of the case.
In a recent development that has stirred significant legal and administrative debate, Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud has insisted on reviewing the Kolkata Police report and the post-mortem report concerning a controversial case involving the death of a Kolkata doctor. The Supreme Court (SC) has raised serious concerns regarding the procedural lapses observed in the handling of the case, particularly criticizing the West Bengal government’s actions.
CJI Chandrachud has made it clear that he will only examine the Kolkata Police report today, underscoring the importance of a thorough and unhurried review of the case’s details. The focus of this scrutiny is the unusual handling of the post-mortem report, which has become a point of contention in the ongoing legal proceedings. In addition to reviewing the police report, the Chief Justice has demanded the post-mortem report of the deceased doctor, aiming to address the issues raised by the case.
The Supreme Court has expressed grave concerns about the procedural errors in the case, particularly criticizing the West Bengal government for conducting a post-mortem examination before formally registering an unnatural death case. This sequence of events has been described by the Court as “very dangerous,” highlighting a breach of standard legal procedures that could have serious implications for the integrity of the investigation.
Justice J.B. Pardiwala, a member of the bench, has voiced strong disapproval of the case handling, stating, ”I have never in 30 years seen a case being handled like this.” His remarks reflect the unprecedented nature of the case and the judicial concern over the procedural anomalies observed. The Justice’s comments underscore the severity of the situation and the potential ramifications for legal and investigative standards.
The West Bengal government’s handling of the post-mortem prior to the registration of the death case has raised questions about adherence to legal norms and procedural correctness. The SC’s criticism points to a need for stringent compliance with established procedures to ensure justice and maintain the credibility of the investigative process.
As the Supreme Court continues to review the case, the demand for accountability and transparency remains high. The legal community and the public await further developments on how this case will be resolved and what implications it may have for future investigations and legal proceedings.
This case serves as a critical reminder of the importance of following proper legal protocols and the impact that procedural lapses can have on the administration of justice. The Supreme Court’s intervention highlights the need for rigorous adherence to legal standards to safeguard the rights of individuals and uphold the rule of law.
