Meta Faces Lawsuit of $109 Million for Unauthorized Use of Eminem Songs

The publishing house Eight Mile Style, responsible for the copyrights of a large part of Eminem's musical catalog, has decided to go all out against Meta. On May 30, the company filed a formal complaint in a federal court in Michigan accusing Mark Zuckerberg's company of using its music without authorization on Facebook and Instagram.

This isn't just a one-time or accidental use. According to the complaint, Meta allegedly used 243 Eminem songs, including classics like Without Me, Stan, and The Real Slim Shady, in various features of its platforms, such as Original Audio and Reels Remix. These tools allow users to use popular songs in their videos without having to manually upload the audio. But according to Eight Mile Style, Meta didn't have a valid legal license to allow the use of these songs, which constitutes a clear copyright infringement.

Furthermore, the publisher's lawyers claim that the platform not only hosted original versions, but also karaoke, instrumentals, and even cover versions without any authorization. And most worryingly, they claim that even after multiple notifications, many of these tracks remain publicly available.

Why $109 million? Calculations and compensation

The $109 million figure that Eight Mile Style is demanding from Meta is not random. The calculation comes from multiplying the maximum legal compensation per song ($150,000) by each platform where the songs were used without a license. In total: 243 songs x 3 platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and Threads) x $150,000 = $109,350,000.

Eight Mile Style claims that Meta not only used these songs without paying or asking permission, but that they did so systematically, as part of their main functions to promote user-generated content. In other words, they made money directly using Eminem's catalog as a hook without giving anything back to the artist or his publisher.

The publisher's legal representatives also argue that this practice caused irreparable harm to the commercial value of the copyrights in Eminem's catalog. In addition to the financial losses, they say the lack of control over how, where, and by whom those songs are used affects the artist's reputation and legacy.

What is Meta's response?

Meta was quick to respond. In a statement sent to several US media outlets, the company assures that it maintains music licensing agreements with thousands of partners around the world and that it has been working for years to allow the legitimate use of music on its platforms.

In this particular case, Meta points out that it had an agreement with Audiam, a company in charge of managing royalties and copyrights. But here comes the key detail: Eight Mile Style claims that it never authorized Audiam to license its music to Meta, so any existing agreement does not apply to its catalog. That is, for the publisher, the contract with Audiam does not justify Meta's use of its songs.

Furthermore, the lawsuit claims that there were attempts at contact and negotiation, but that Meta never offered a formal or valid proposal. Therefore, Eight Mile Style opted to resort to legal means.

What's at stake for Meta and the music industry?

This is not a minor case. If the court rules in favor of Eight Mile Style, not only does Meta face a multimillion-dollar fine, but it could open the door to more lawsuits of this type. Large platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube base part of their growth on content with music, and creators often don't care whether or not the songs are licensed.

What happens if Meta fails to prove that it had authorization? Well, it will most likely have to pay the almost $109 million that the publisher is demanding. And beyond money, this would set a precedent for other music publishers to take legal action to claim similar compensation. The tension between technology and music copyright isn't new, but this particular case could be a turning point. If Meta loses, other platforms will have to scrutinize all their licensing agreements, and that could directly affect how users can continue to use music in their content. For now, everything is in the hands of the court. But one thing is clear: Eight Mile Style isn't willing to let a company the size of Meta use Eminem's music as if it were public domain.Where and by whom those songs are used affects the artist's reputation and legacy.

What is Meta's response?

Meta was quick to respond. In a statement sent to several US media outlets, the company asserts that it maintains music licensing agreements with thousands of partners around the world and that it has been working for years to enable the legitimate use of music on its platforms.

In this particular case, Meta points out that it had an agreement with Audiam, a company in charge of managing royalties and copyrights. But here comes the key detail: Eight Mile Style claims that it never authorized Audiam to license its music to Meta, so any existing agreement does not apply to its catalog. In other words, for the publisher, the contract with Audiam does not justify Meta's use of its songs.

Furthermore, the lawsuit asserts that there were attempts at contact and negotiation, but that Meta never offered a formal or valid proposal. That's why Eight Mile Style opted to take legal action.

What's at stake for Meta and the music industry?

This is no minor case. If the court rules in favor of Eight Mile Style, not only does Meta face a multimillion-dollar fine, but it could open the door to more lawsuits of this type. Large platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube base part of their growth on music-based content, and creators often don't care whether the songs are licensed or not.

What happens if Meta can't prove that it had authorization? Well, it will most likely have to pay the nearly $109 million that the publisher is demanding. And beyond the money, this would set a precedent for other music publishers to take legal action to claim similar compensation.

The tension between technology and music copyright is not new, but this particular case could be a turning point. If Meta loses, other platforms will have to scrutinize all their licensing agreements, and that could directly affect how users can continue to use music in their content. For now, everything is in the hands of the court. But one thing is clear: Eight Mile Style isn't willing to let a company the size of Meta use Eminem's music as if it were public domain.Where and by whom those songs are used affects the artist's reputation and legacy.

What is Meta's response?

Meta was quick to respond. In a statement sent to several US media outlets, the company asserts that it maintains music licensing agreements with thousands of partners around the world and that it has been working for years to enable the legitimate use of music on its platforms.

In this particular case, Meta points out that it had an agreement with Audiam, a company in charge of managing royalties and copyrights. But here comes the key detail: Eight Mile Style claims that it never authorized Audiam to license its music to Meta, so any existing agreement does not apply to its catalog. In other words, for the publisher, the contract with Audiam does not justify Meta's use of its songs.

Furthermore, the lawsuit asserts that there were attempts at contact and negotiation, but that Meta never offered a formal or valid proposal. That's why Eight Mile Style opted to take legal action.

What's at stake for Meta and the music industry?

This is no minor case. If the court rules in favor of Eight Mile Style, not only does Meta face a multimillion-dollar fine, but it could open the door to more lawsuits of this type. Large platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube base part of their growth on music-based content, and creators often don't care whether the songs are licensed or not.

What happens if Meta can't prove that it had authorization? Well, it will most likely have to pay the nearly $109 million that the publisher is demanding. And beyond the money, this would set a precedent for other music publishers to take legal action to claim similar compensation.

The tension between technology and music copyright is not new, but this particular case could be a turning point. If Meta loses, other platforms will have to scrutinize all their licensing agreements, and that could directly affect how users can continue to use music in their content. For now, everything is in the hands of the court. But one thing is clear: Eight Mile Style isn't willing to let a company the size of Meta use Eminem's music as if it were public domain.

In this particular case, Meta points out that it had an agreement with Audiam, a company in charge of managing royalties and copyrights. But here comes the key detail: Eight Mile Style claims that it never authorized Audiam to license its music to Meta, so any existing agreement doesn't apply to its catalog. In other words, for the publisher, the contract with Audiam doesn't justify Meta's use of its songs.

Furthermore, the lawsuit claims that there were attempts at contact and negotiation, but that Meta never offered a formal or valid proposal. Therefore, Eight Mile Style opted to resort to legal action.

What's at stake for Meta and the music industry?

This is no minor case. If the court rules in favor of Eight Mile Style, not only does Meta face a multimillion-dollar fine, but it could open the door to more lawsuits of this type. Large platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube base part of their growth on music-based content, and creators often don't care whether or not the songs are licensed.

What happens if Meta fails to prove it had authorization? Well, it will most likely have to pay the nearly $109 million that the publisher is demanding. And beyond the money, this would set a precedent for other music publishers to take legal action to claim similar compensation.

The tension between technology and music copyright is not new, but this particular case could be a turning point. If Meta loses, other platforms will have to scrutinize all their licensing agreements, and that could directly affect how users can continue to use music in their content.

For now, everything is in the hands of the court. But one thing is clear: Eight Mile Style is not willing to let a company the size of Meta use Eminem's music as if it were public domain.

This news has been tken from authentic news syndicates and agencies and only the wordings has been changed keeping the menaing intact. We have not done personal research yet and do not guarantee the complete genuinity and request you to verify from other sources too.