Mathura ShriKrishna JanamBhoomi: After the Ram Janmabhoomi, now the case of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi reached the court, the demand for the removal of the royal mosque

A civil suit has been filed in the court regarding Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura. The case has been filed by Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain, Lord Krishna Virajaman's Sakha Ranjana Agnihotri. There has been an appeal to remove the Idgah mosque.

26th September, 2020


Mathura ShriKrishna JanamBhoomi: Between the commencement of the construction work of Lord Ram's grand temple in Ayodhya, the city of Lord Rama, a civil case in the name of Lord Shri Krishna Viramajaman has been registered in Mathura, the birthplace of Lord Krishna. The suit is filed by Lord Sri Krishna Virajaman, Katra Keshav Dev Khevat, Mauja Mathura Bazar City 'as the next friend Ranjana Agnihotri and six other devotees.

Sri Krishna Virajaman also filed a civil suit in the court of Mathura over 13.37 acres of land. Along with this, there has been a demand to remove the royal Idgah mosque from the side. This case has been filed in the court of Mathura. In this case, an appeal has been made to give ownership of 13.37 acres of land of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi and remove Idgah Mosque from there. This suit has been filed by Lord Shri Krishna Virajaman's Sakha Ranjana Agnihotri and six others.

The claim has been filed in the court of Civil Judge Senior Division Chhaya Sharma, denying that the land was given to the royal Idgah mosque in the premises of Sri Krishna's birthplace in Mathura. Shri Krishna Virajaman, Asthan Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi, Ranjana Agnihotri and Tripurari Tripathi resident of Lucknow, Krishna Bhakta Pravesh Kumar, resident of Delhi, Karunesh Kumar Shukla and Shiva Ji Singh, Krishna Bhakta Rajmani Tripathi, resident of Siddharth Nagar, claim that In 1968, the land agreement was signed between Sri Krishna Janmasthana Seva Sangh and Shahi Idgah Mosque. It was decided that the mosque will remain as much land as it is built. The plaintiff's advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain said that the land on which the mosque is built is in the name of Sri Krishna Janmasthan Trust. In such a situation, the agreement made by the service association is wrong. They have demanded the removal of the mosque.

The court filed the case stating that with the help of Muslims, the Shahi Idgah Trust occupied the birthplace belonging to Shri Krishna and built a structure in place of God. The birthplace of Shri Krishna, the eighth avatar of Lord Vishnu, is located under the same structure. The petition also claimed that the Srikrishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan, which administers the temple complex, entered into an illegal agreement with the Shahi Idgah Trust for the property. It was alleged that Shri Krishna Janmasthana Seva Sansthan was acting contrary to the interests of the devotees, so fraudulently, the managing committee of the Masjid Idgah Trust entered into an agreement in 1968 to grab a large part of the property.

Before this, another case was filed in the court of civil judge of Mathura. Which was closed on the basis of agreement between Sri Krishna Janma Seva Sansthan and Trust. On 20 July 1973, the court gave a decision in this regard. In the current dispute, the court has sought to quash that decision. Along with this, it has also been demanded that the disputed site be declared the birthplace of Bal Shri Krishna.

In the court case, it is said that with the help of Muslims, the royal Idgah Trust occupied the Janmabhoomi related to Sri Krishna and built a structure in place of God. The birthplace of Shri Krishna, the eighth incarnation of Lord Vishnu, is situated under the same structure. The petition also claimed that the Srikrishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan, which administers the temple complex, entered into an illegal settlement with the Shahi Idgah Trust for the property. Allegations that the 'Sri Krishna Janmastha Seva Sansthan' are acting contrary to the interests of the devotees, so fraudulently, the managing committee of the Masjid Idgah Trust, in 1968, entered into an agreement to grab a major chunk of the property.

Earlier, another case was filed in the court of the Civil Judge of Mathura which was closed on the basis of the agreement between Sri Krishna Janma Seva Sansthan and Trust. On 20 July 1973, the court gave a decision in this regard. In the current dispute, the court has sought to quash that decision. Along with this, it has also been demanded that the disputed site be declared the birthplace of Bal Sri Krishna.

A civil suit has been filed in the court regarding Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura. The case has been filed by Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain, Lord Sri Krishna Virajaman's Sakha Ranjana Agnihotri. His petition termed the 1968 agreement on land as false. Along with Vishnu Shankar Jain, Ranjana Agnihotri is also associated with the case of Shri Ram's birthplace in Ayodhya. Through this petition, he has sought ownership of 13.37 acres of Krishna Janmabhoomi. Which was captured in the Mughal period and made a royal Idgah. There is a demand to remove the royal Idgah mosque. The suit has been filed by advocate Ranjana Agnihotri and six other devotees on behalf of Lord Sri Krishna Virajaman, Katra Keshava Dev Khevat, Mauja Mathura Bazar City as an intimate friend.

It was clarified that the plaintiff Katra Keshav Dev Kewat, Mouja is sitting Sri Krishna of Mathura Bazaar. According to lawyers Harishankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain, the case has been filed by the Masjid Idgah Management Committee to remove the encroachment. On the other hand, a major hindrance to the law is the Places of Worship Act 1991. According to this act, the religious place that belonged to the religious place on 15 August 1947 at the time of independence will belong to the same. The Sriram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute was exempted under this Act.

Just a few days ago, in the meeting of the Akhara Council in Prayagraj, there was a discussion about the saint-saint Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi and Kashi Vishwanath Temple. The Akhil Bhartiya Akhara Parishad has included the removal of the Idgah Mosque of Mathura and the Gyanvapi Mosque of Kashi in its agenda. The saints have also started mobilization for Kashi-Mathura. In its meeting of Prayagraj, the Akhara Council had decided to free the temples of Kashi and Mathura. The land on which the Idgah Mosque is located in Mathura is called Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi.

Chief worshiper of Vrindavan Gangadhar Pathak, who worshiped the land for the construction of Shri Ram temple in Ayodhya, had demanded during Prime Minister Narendra Modi that Kashi Vishwanath in Varanasi and Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura should also be free.

Category: India

#ShriKrishnaJanamBhoomi
#ShriKrishnaJanamBhoomiMathura
#ShriKrishnaJanmabhoomiCaseofMathurainCivilCourt
#ShriRamJanmabhoomiCaseofAyodhya
#Mathura
#EidgahMasjidMathura
#AkharaParishad
#UttarPradeshnews

Reported by:
Pankaj Prasad