News247Plus Logo

ICE intensifies surveillance on social networks to identify and track its critics

Millionaire contracts, AI and subpoenas to platforms are part of the strategy to monitor publications on immigration

ICE intensifies surveillance on social networks to identify and track its critics
News Desk
News Desk Aug 04, 2026 - 13:20 UTC
Time to Read 2 Min
Share:

The strategy of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Service (ICE) to combat threats against its agents has taken a turn that worries civil rights organizations. According to an investigation published by The Wall Street Journal, the agency has deployed a digital surveillance system that monitors platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, Discord and LinkedIn to identify posts considered risky to its operations.

The program not only seeks to detect threats of violence. According to the report, it has also reached American citizens and activists who spread information about immigration operations or publicly criticize the actions of ICE. The contractors prepare files with personal data such as address, place of work, date of birth and even background information of those who publish on the Internet.

Citations and technology to identify users

The investigation reveals that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has sent hundreds of subpoenas to social media companies to try to identify anonymous accounts. In some cases, federal agents visited users at their workplaces or homes to warn them that their publications “could” constitute a crime.

Reddit's chief legal officer, Ben Lee, said the company rejected government requests because it believed users were engaging in activities protected by the First Amendment.

“Privacy is fundamental to the operation of Reddit,” said Lee, explaining that the platform opposes requests that threaten the civil rights of its users.

Civil rights advocates warn about intimidation

While the DHS assures that these actions seek to respond to the increase in threats against ICE agents, constitutional lawyers question the scope of the strategy and warn of a possible inhibiting effect on freedom of expression.

Lawyer Lauren Regan, who represents people investigated for their publications, assured that many of the expressions analyzed do not constitute real threats.

“Nothing close to real threats,” Regan said, referring to comments that have prompted federal investigations.