In the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, the Uttar Pradesh government told the Supreme Court that it had opposed the bail plea of accused Ashish Mishra. Also apprised the court that the eyewitness of the incident had seen the accused Mishra running away from the spot and this is also mentioned in the charge sheet. The Uttar Pradesh government said in the court that the crime is of a serious category and in such a situation, granting bail to the accused can have a bad effect on the society. Explain that the Supreme Court is hearing the bail plea of Ashish Mishra, accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case. Ashish Mishra has filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Allahabad High Court, in which the High Court refused to grant bail to Ashish Mishra in the violence case. 

Ashish Mishra, son of Union minister Ajay Mishra Teni, is an accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case. It is alleged that in October 2021, Ashish Mishra's car had trampled the farmers who were protesting in Tikonia of Lakhimpur Kheri. In which four farmers had died. The protesters then attacked the people in the SUV, in which the driver of the car and two BJP workers were killed. 

In this case, the accused Ashish Mishra is lodged in jail. Accused Ashish Mishra had filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court for bail, but in its decision given in July last year, the High Court had rejected the bail plea of Ashish Mishra. Significantly, in the Tikonia case, the High Court had granted bail to Ashish Mishra on February 10 last year, but later the Supreme Court quashed the bail order and directed the High Court to decide on the bail plea by giving adequate opportunity to the aggrieved party. Tell me On this, the High Court had heard the bail petition again.