The Supreme Court is hearing several petitions seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage. On the third day of hearing on Thursday, the top court said that the inflow of cases in the Supreme Court is so high that it is impossible to list the cases of the constitution bench until the time is fixed for arguments. Earlier on Wednesday, the Supreme Court had stressed on the need to finish the matter in a time-bound manner, saying that there were other matters awaiting hearing.

Constitution Bench was not constituted due to pressure of number of cases: CJI

Presiding Chief Justice DY Chandrachud said that the Chief Justices before him had not constituted constitution benches because of the high number of cases coming in the Supreme Court, which put a lot of pressure on the court. He said that if the constitution bench has to be run really, you know, five judges will have to leave their routine work and engage in it. That is the reason why the Chief Justices before me did not set up Constitution Benches because you do not know the kind of pressure that prevails here. Every evening I ask how many cases have come and how many have been disposed off. 

Don't want This is the real problem in our court. The inflow of cases is so huge that unless we start scheduling, you know, it is impossible to list the cases of the Constitution Bench. In this bench, apart from CJI Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice SR Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha are also included. It is impossible to list the cases of the Constitution Bench. In this bench, apart from CJI Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice SR Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha are also included. It is impossible to list the cases of the Constitution Bench. In this bench, apart from CJI Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice SR Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha are also included.

Initially, a lawyer submitted a list of lawyers to the bench. In which it was told that these lawyers will argue on behalf of the petitioners and also how much time they will take. The CJI said that the petitioners' side will have to complete their arguments by the end of the day as the court has to give sufficient time to the other side as well. He said, there are also Supreme Courts where the entire debate has to be completed in 30 minutes. We have given three days to the side of the petitioners in this court, which I think is too much.

What issue would she focus on and how would she deal with the matter. The bench said that next week it will sit on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday to conclude the arguments of both the sides. During the hearing, one of the advocates said that they would curtail the time and the petitioners' side would conclude their arguments on Monday. Will sit on Wednesday and Thursday so that the debate on both sides can end. During the hearing, one of the advocates said that they would curtail the time and the petitioners' side would conclude their arguments on Monday. Will sit on Wednesday and Thursday so that the debate on both sides can end. During the hearing, one of the advocates said that they would curtail the time and the petitioners' side would conclude their arguments on Monday. 

You are also aware that this matter has been taken up on priority basis. We are trying to end it. If you don't want it to end, then you don't end it.

He will not consider 'personal law' relating to marriages while deciding petitions seeking legal recognition of marriages. The hearing and decision on the petitions will have a significant impact on the country, as common people and political parties hold different views on the subject.

had sought response from the Center on separate petitions filed by In these petitions, both the couples have sought enforcement of their right to marry and a direction to the concerned authorities to register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act.