Comparison between iPhone 17 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: Which is better?
Find out which phone emerges as the winner in the race for the title of the best high-end phone on the market between Apple and Samsung
In this direct comparison between two heavyweights of mobile technology in 2025, the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vie for the throne of premium smartphones. Both offer impressive features, but what are their key differences in battery, camera, price, power, and storage? Here's a fresh and clear analysis to help you decide which model best suits your needs.
Battery and duration: power for the entire day and more
The iPhone 17 Pro Max boasts a battery that ranges between 4,823 and 5,088 mAh, which means improved autonomy, especially with the new vapor chamber cooling system that helps maintain performance without overheating. In addition, it has USB-C fast charging and support for MagSafe and Qi 2 wireless charging, standing out as a battery capable of lasting long days even with intensive use.
On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra equips a fixed 5,000 mAh battery, almost at the level of the iPhone, with very good energy management thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite processor. It also offers fast charging and wireless charging, with support for advanced battery protection technologies. In real terms, both offer excellent battery life, but the S25 Ultra is a bit more consistent in offering hours of screen-on time given its optimization on Android.
The battery is a technical tie, although the iPhone has the advantage of its cooling system and improved Qi 2 charging, while the Samsung has a slight advantage in raw capacity.
Cameras: the battle of megapixels and versatility
Here the differences are obvious: the iPhone 17 Pro Max relies on a triple camera system with 48 MP main sensors in all its lenses (main, telephoto and ultra-wide), with stabilization technology and optical zoom of up to 8x, accompanied by an 18 MP front camera that is excellent for selfies and high-quality video calls.
Samsung, for its part, packs a strong punch with a 200 MP main sensor, backed by 50MP ultra-wide and 5x and 3x zoom telephoto cameras. Its front camera remains at 12 MP,but the advantage is in the photographic versatility and 8K video at 30 fps with advanced stabilization, ideal for lovers of professional mobile photography.
In short: Samsung offers a photographic arsenal with much more resolution and variety, while Apple maintains a consistent experience, with balanced images and processing improvements that remain favorites for those who prefer more natural colors and AI optimization.
Price, power and storage: luxury and performance in every detail
The price is a decisive factor: the iPhone 17 Pro Max has an approximate base cost of $1,199 to $1,299 dollars, depending on the storage configuration, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra starts at around $949 dollars, going up to almost $3,149 dollars for the top-of-the-line version with 1TB of storage.
In terms of power, the iPhone mounts the A19 Pro chip with 12 GB of RAM, which according to Apple offers performance up to 40% better performance in games and intensive tasks than the previous generation, with an architecture optimized for AI and advanced graphics, as well as a new generation of wireless connectivity.
Samsung relies on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, known for its efficiency and power, also with 12 GB of RAM (although a 16 GB version is available in certain markets). This processor excels in multitasking and gaming with a noticeable 30-40% improvement in GPU and CPU performance compared to its predecessor.
Regarding storage, Apple offers options from 256 GB to 2 TB, ideal for those who download a lot of content or work with large files. Samsung sticks to a maximum of 1 TB, but it's still more than enough for almost any user.
In short, the iPhone is more expensive but offers extreme storage options and a chip that competes at the top, while Samsung offers almost equal power at a more affordable price and RAM options typical of the high-end.
This news has been tken from authentic news syndicates and agencies and only the wordings has been changed keeping the menaing intact. We have not done personal research yet and do not guarantee the complete genuinity and request you to verify from other sources too.
