Arguments Presented by the Defense

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, arguing on behalf of Arvind Kejriwal, submitted that the arrest by the CBI was entirely unwarranted. “The dates of the case cry out for themselves,” Singhvi stated, emphasizing that the arrest was orchestrated despite a lack of substantial evidence against Kejriwal. He further argued that Kejriwal has always cooperated with the investigation and there was no need for such a drastic measure.

Singhvi highlighted that Kejriwal’s arrest appears to be politically motivated, aimed at tarnishing his reputation and disrupting the functioning of the Delhi government. He pointed out that Kejriwal has been an advocate of transparency and anti-corruption, making the allegations against him highly ironic and unfounded.

CBI’s Stance on the Case

On the other hand, the CBI defended its actions, stating that the arrest was made following due process and was based on credible evidence linking Kejriwal to the alleged irregularities in the Excise policy. The agency asserted that Kejriwal’s involvement in the case warranted his detention to ensure a thorough and unbiased investigation.

The CBI further argued that the arrest was necessary to prevent any potential tampering with evidence or influencing of witnesses. They stressed that the investigation is at a critical stage and Kejriwal’s presence in custody is crucial for uncovering the truth.

Public and Political Reactions

The case has garnered significant attention from both the public and political circles. Supporters of Arvind Kejriwal have rallied behind him, condemning the arrest as a blatant misuse of power. Various political leaders and activists have voiced their concerns, calling for a fair and transparent investigation.

Conversely, critics of Kejriwal argue that no individual, regardless of their position, should be above the law and that the investigation must proceed without any hindrance. The polarized opinions have added to the intensity of the ongoing legal battle.

Future Implications

The outcome of this hearing holds significant implications for the political landscape of Delhi. A decision in favor of Kejriwal could bolster his position and reaffirm his claims of innocence, while a ruling against him could lead to further legal and political challenges. The court’s decision will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.